• About the author
  • Colleagues
  • Contract work
  • Recordings

The Mnemonic Lode

Memory. Measurement. Life in Academia.

  • About the author
  • Colleagues
  • Contract work
  • Recordings

Social rewards make it easier for women than men to lose ambition

October 31, 2015 Academia No Comments

I lately read this article about how women’s ambition declines more quickly than men’s, as well as this article about the advantages anyone with a spouse who takes the lead role at home has over the rest of us. Both offer a lot to discuss, but one point that I think is really important that isn’t explicitly mentioned in either place is that women are more likely then men to be socially rewarded, at least in the near-term, for offering to take on the supportive spouse role. The social rewards for sacrificing ambitious careers, apparently reserved exclusively for women, make leaving academia behind entirely a more plausible option for women than it is likely to be for men.

One thing that drives academics (really every ambitious career-person) is the sweet, sweet approval of others, coming to us in the form of papers being accepted and cited, grants being funded, and all manner of positive professional recognition of work well done. Suppose though, that you have been struggling to publish your first independent papers or to win an early-career grant. The serial rejections are disheartening. Compared with the grinding discouragement offered by granting agencies and journal editors, the new challenge of starting a family, or making the decision to focus primarily on supporting your family, might look more and more attractive.

At every critical juncture (shifting from student to post-doc, from post-doc to lecturer, etc.), men and women are subject to similar pressures at work but drastically different prospects if they choose to turn their focus away from work: in a dual-career marriage, a woman who opts to become the lead spouse and put her career aside will be making a completely “normal” decision, one that all her family and community might be expecting her to make and will perhaps even applaud her for, one that few people will find surprising or objectionable. Making the decision to be the supportive spouse may entail sacrificing some ambition, but the woman who makes this choice will at least have the immediate hit of affirming social approval. However, picture a man considering the same decision: in addition to decreasing his odds of the earning the most coveted professional successes, he can look forward to the many bewildering social encounters that Moravcsik describes. He is unlikely to expect his parents and extended family to rejoice over this decision. In a sense, his choice is more restricted, but it leads also to the greater likelihood that he will remain ambitious at work.

Women who are showing equivalent skills to their male peers are more likely to leave work at every stage. We treat the perseverance necessary for success as a heroic feat, and wring our hands over why women are less likely to have it, but there is little reason to think that men and women differ in this trait. The choices they are likely to make are not really so unexpected if we treat men and women who prioritize their families so differently.

academic couplesacademic lifedual-career couples

Bayesian methods and experimental design

A visit from the Ghost of Research Past

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

  • In memoriam, Bill
  • Wrangling messy data in R using the tidyverse
  • Alessandra Souza, the 2019 WomWoM Research Fairy
  • #WomWom: A wand award for the 2018 research-fairy
  • I’ve got a lab handbook now

Recent Comments

  • Alessandra on Alessandra Souza, the 2019 WomWoM Research Fairy
  • Alessandra Souza, the 2019 WomWoM Research Fairy – The Mnemonic Lode on #WomWom: A wand award for the 2018 research-fairy
  • Candice Morey on #WomWom: A wand award for the 2018 research-fairy
  • Candice Morey on Going for a Registered Report?
  • Alessandra Souza on Going for a Registered Report?

Archives

  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • November 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015

Categories

  • Academia
  • Measurement
  • Openness
  • Research
  • Uncategorized
  • WomWoM

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About me

  • About the author
  • Colleagues
  • Contract work
  • Recordings
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Doo by ThemeVS.