• About the author
  • Colleagues
  • Contract work
  • Recordings

The Mnemonic Lode

Memory. Measurement. Life in Academia.

  • About the author
  • Colleagues
  • Contract work
  • Recordings

Eye movements as retrieval cues?

February 2, 2016 Research No Comments

I’ll be speaking on Friday in the International Colloquia Series at the School of Psychology at Cardiff University on my newest line of research: figuring out whether eye movements cue memory retrieval. Eye movements have been proposed as a possible analog to speech-based verbal rehearsal, potentially useful for retrieving ordered spatial locations. My data support the idea that eye movements cue retrieval, but calling this process rehearsal is dubious. My talk is at 2:10 pm, LT3.

Title: Tracking maintenance of visual memories using eye movements

Abstract: Though rehearsal of verbal information has been extensively studied and described, the processes available to support memory for visual information remain mysterious. Motor activities, particularly eye movements, have been suggested as a basis for rehearsing visual-spatial memories, analogous to articulatory support for maintaining verbal information. Eye movements toward locations previously occupied by stimuli may reflect covert attempts to retrieve information about those items. I present evidence linking fixations during retention intervals in memory tasks to response accuracy, which is consistent with the idea that eye movements may be used as a cue to recover visual-spatial information. The strength of these relationships varies depending on the sort of visual material maintained, and varies between young adults and children. I shall discuss implications of these relationships for models of working memory. Though eye movements and response accuracy are related, the evidence is not consistent with the proposition that eye movements serve as the basis for a specialized rehearsal module of visual-spatial memories.

Slides, in case you are joining the periscope of the talk, can be found here.

Pre-emptive open science is fairer open science

Interpreting nulls, even surprising ones, is not trivial

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

  • In memoriam, Bill
  • Wrangling messy data in R using the tidyverse
  • Alessandra Souza, the 2019 WomWoM Research Fairy
  • #WomWom: A wand award for the 2018 research-fairy
  • I’ve got a lab handbook now

Recent Comments

  • Alessandra on Alessandra Souza, the 2019 WomWoM Research Fairy
  • Alessandra Souza, the 2019 WomWoM Research Fairy – The Mnemonic Lode on #WomWom: A wand award for the 2018 research-fairy
  • Candice Morey on #WomWom: A wand award for the 2018 research-fairy
  • Candice Morey on Going for a Registered Report?
  • Alessandra Souza on Going for a Registered Report?

Archives

  • May 2020
  • November 2019
  • November 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • January 2018
  • August 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015

Categories

  • Academia
  • Measurement
  • Openness
  • Research
  • Uncategorized
  • WomWoM

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

About me

  • About the author
  • Colleagues
  • Contract work
  • Recordings
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Doo by ThemeVS.